The Canada Post Corporation informed the Union of its intention to unilaterally introduce right-hand drive vehicles (RHD) on RSMC routes. The Corporation also informed the Union of its intention to charge to the RSMC financial cap the costs associated with its decision.

In the verification of data related to one or more routes, the Canada Post Corporation has failed to implement appropriate and effective measures to ensure that employees receive the correct annual pay for their route. The employer is altering working conditions, i.e. Articles 11 and 35, Appendix “A” and other provisions of the collective agreement. Employees have been unjustly deprived of the payment they are entitled to under Article 33. This constitutes a violation of the collective agreement.

On April 14, 2010, the employer advised the Union of its intention to change the

On February 18, 2010, John Thomas, CPC Manager, Labour Relations, in Ottawa, informed the Union that the Corporation did not intend to return to the financial cap the amounts deducted for a hand sanitizer provided to Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers in 2009 to help prevent the H1N1 virus, as well as the seasonal flu. The employer has violated the collective agreement.

As of December 31, 2009, the Canada Post Corporation (the employer) has decided to stop accepting and/or processing new requests regarding the contractor start date of rural and suburban mail carriers (RSMC) hired as employees on January 1st, 2004 (contract holders, sub-contractors, replacements or helpers) for the purpose of establishing the seniority ranking of RSMCs. The employer is violating the provisions of the collective agreement and the established practice.

On or about August 18, 2009, Canada Post advised the Union that it was sending all rural and suburban mail carriers (RSMCs) an information package regarding the security screening of replacement contractors and others carrying out duties on RSMC routes.

On Thursday, April 9, 2009, the Union learned through its members that the employer had given employees of the rural and suburban mail carriers (RSMC) unit a $50 gift card. The employer did this in such a way as to avoid consulting the Union. As a result, Canada Post has violated the RSMC collective agreement, and, specifically but not exclusively, Articles 3 and 7 of the RSMC collective agreement

In a letter dated March 9, 2009, which was received by the Union on March 11, 2009, the employer advised the Union that it intended to amend the collective agreement and the current practice in relation to the boot allowance for employees of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers’ (RSMC) unit, as set out in clause 24.03 of the RSMC collective agreement. The employer has decided to stop paying the boot allowance to employees who have been inactive for a year. This constitutes a violation of the collective agreement.

The employer is violating the provisions of the Collective Agreement when maintaining that the allowance for the pilot project on right-hand drive (RHD) vehicles and all related training costs will be charged to the financial cap.

The employer has failed to abide by the collective agreement by obstructing the right of its employees to apply on an informed basis for vacant positions in a postal installation within a 50-kilometre radius of their current postal installation. The information indicated on the posting of vacant routes is incomplete and does not enable employees to make an informed decision, and they may suffer adverse effects as a result. Furthermore, the employer is not posting vacant routes in all of its postal installations and is only posting these on the internet or Intr@post. The employer is therefore failing in its contractual obligations.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) is challenging the Canada Post Corporation (CPC) policy of prohibiting bargaining unit employees from wearing a button or other insignia to promote Canada’s public postal service. CUPW also challenges CPC’s policy of disciplining employees who refuse to obey the policy directive or an order to remove such buttons or insignia.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the Corporation is in violation of Article 35 and other applicable provisions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in its determination of the amount to be applied against the financial cap with respect to the pension plan.

The Canada Post Corporation is contravening the provisions of the collective agreement by charging expenses to the financial cap that are not contemplated by the collective agreement nor agreed to by the union.

The Canada Post Corporation is refusing or failing to pay absent rural and suburban letter carriers for the designated paid holidays provided for in the collective agreement. In doing so, Canada Post is violating the provisions of the collective agreement, more specifically, but not limited to, Article 16. In addition, the Corporation is also violating legislation in situations where employees are absent for fewer than fifteen (15) days in the thirty (30)-day period prior to the designated paid holiday.

Following the decision by several employees to exercise their right to refuse to perform work because of work methods they deemed dangerous to their health and safety, the Corporation unilaterally adopted measures, including hiring staff, without referring the matter to the appropriate health and safety committees and without negotiating an agreement or solution with the Union.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer has violated article 15 and other applicable provisions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers (RSMC) collective agreement. The employer is failing to provide each RSMC employee with two (2) weeks of paid vacation leave during the 2004 calendar year and is also failing to allow the leave entitlement earned during the 2004 calendar year to be carried over to the following calendar year(s).

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer is in violation of article 11 and other portions or the RSMC collective agreement in that it is not notifying the Transition Committee as soon as possible or providing it with all relevant information when it is modifying routes as described in clauses 11.03 and 11.04.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer has violated Article 12 and other relevant portions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in that it is failing to give priority consideration to candidates from eligibility lists when it is applying the external hiring process.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer has violated Articles 11, 33, Appendix "A" and other applicable articles and appendices of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in that it is treating the Sears Catalogue delivered in January 2004 as addressed admail.