The Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) is challenging the Canada Post Corporation (CPC) policy of prohibiting bargaining unit employees from wearing a button or other insignia to promote Canada’s public postal service. CUPW also challenges CPC’s policy of disciplining employees who refuse to obey the policy directive or an order to remove such buttons or insignia.

Following the decision by several employees to exercise their right to refuse to perform work because of work methods they deemed dangerous to their health and safety, the Corporation unilaterally adopted measures, including hiring staff, without referring the matter to the appropriate health and safety committees and without negotiating an agreement or solution with the Union.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer is in violation of Article 3 and other applicable portions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in that it is not allowing individuals to maintain or obtain employment status under the provisions of the RSMC Collective Agreement if they are also employed by Canada Post under the terms of a different collective agreement.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer is in violation of Articles 3, 24 and other applicable portions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement and the Canada Labour Code in that it has, by letter dated July 13, 2004, confirmed that representatives of the Canadian Postmasters and Assistants Association (CPAA) would be the employee Health and Safety representatives at the post office level.

On June 3, 2008, the Union received a letter dated May 30, 2008 in which the employer informed the Union of its intent to introduce unilaterally an “Employee Referral Program.” This program consists in paying $500.00 to any employee who refers someone for a position in the RSMC bargaining unit. The employer is violating the provisions of the collective agreement.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) is challenging the Canada Post Corporation (CPC) policy of prohibiting bargaining unit employees from wearing a button or other insignia to promote Canada’s public postal service. CUPW also challenges CPC’s policy of disciplining employees who refuse to obey the policy directive or an order to remove such buttons or insignia.

On Thursday, April 9, 2009, the Union learned through its members that the employer had given employees of the rural and suburban mail carriers (RSMC) unit a $50 gift card. The employer did this in such a way as to avoid consulting the Union. As a result, Canada Post has violated the RSMC collective agreement, and, specifically but not exclusively, Articles 3 and 7 of the RSMC collective agreement

Following the decision by several employees to exercise their right to refuse to perform work because of work methods they deemed dangerous to their health and safety, the Corporation unilaterally adopted measures, including hiring staff, without referring the matter to the appropriate health and safety committees and without negotiating an agreement or solution with the Union.

On Thursday, April 9, 2009, the Union learned through its members that the employer had given employees of the rural and suburban mail carriers (RSMC) unit a $50 gift card. The employer did this in such a way as to avoid consulting the Union. As a result, Canada Post has violated the RSMC collective agreement, and, specifically but not exclusively, Articles 3 and 7 of the RSMC collective agreement

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer has violated Article 12 and other relevant portions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in that it is failing to give priority consideration to candidates from eligibility lists when it is applying the external hiring process.

The employer has failed to abide by the collective agreement by obstructing the right of its employees to apply on an informed basis for vacant positions in a postal installation within a 50-kilometre radius of their current postal installation. The information indicated on the posting of vacant routes is incomplete and does not enable employees to make an informed decision, and they may suffer adverse effects as a result. Furthermore, the employer is not posting vacant routes in all of its postal installations and is only posting these on the internet or Intr@post. The employer is therefore failing in its contractual obligations.

Following the decision by several employees to exercise their right to refuse to perform work because of work methods they deemed dangerous to their health and safety, the Corporation unilaterally adopted measures, including hiring staff, without referring the matter to the appropriate health and safety committees and without negotiating an agreement or solution with the Union.

When changes are made to a route under Articles 11, 12, 13, 34 and other provisions of the collective agreement, the employer is failing to provide the Transition Committee with all relevant information, in violation of the collective agreement imposed by interest arbitrator B. Keller.

On or about August 18, 2009, Canada Post advised the Union that it was sending all rural and suburban mail carriers (RSMCs) an information package regarding the security screening of replacement contractors and others carrying out duties on RSMC routes.

The Canada Post Corporation is refusing or failing to pay absent rural and suburban letter carriers for the designated paid holidays provided for in the collective agreement. In doing so, Canada Post is violating the provisions of the collective agreement, more specifically, but not limited to, Article 16. In addition, the Corporation is also violating legislation in situations where employees are absent for fewer than fifteen (15) days in the thirty (30)-day period prior to the designated paid holiday.

Following the decision by several employees to exercise their right to refuse to perform work because of work methods they deemed dangerous to their health and safety, the Corporation unilaterally adopted measures, including hiring staff, without referring the matter to the appropriate health and safety committees and without negotiating an agreement or solution with the Union.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer has violated Articles 11, 33, Appendix "A" and other applicable articles and appendices of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in that it is treating the Sears Catalogue delivered in January 2004 as addressed admail.

In the verification of data related to one or more routes, the Canada Post Corporation has failed to implement appropriate and effective measures to ensure that employees receive the correct annual pay for their route. The employer is altering working conditions, i.e. Articles 11 and 35, Appendix “A” and other provisions of the collective agreement. Employees have been unjustly deprived of the payment they are entitled to under Article 33. This constitutes a violation of the collective agreement.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer is in violation of article 35 and other applicable provisions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers (RSMC) collective agreement in that it is using the wrong calendar year as the "base financial year" and is therefore miscalculating the "base amount", beyond which the parties have agreed to allocate an additional twenty-nine million dollars ($29,000,000) in the first year of the RSMC collective agreement.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the Corporation is in violation of Article 35 and other applicable provisions of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in its determination of the amount to be applied against the financial cap with respect to the pension plan.

On February 18, 2010, John Thomas, CPC Manager, Labour Relations, in Ottawa, informed the Union that the Corporation did not intend to return to the financial cap the amounts deducted for a hand sanitizer provided to Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers in 2009 to help prevent the H1N1 virus, as well as the seasonal flu. The employer has violated the collective agreement.

The employer has violated the provisions of Article 35 and others of the collective agreement by advising the Union of its intention to apply $6M to the financial cap. The employer alleges that transactions made by the Transition Committee as a result of route restructurings and the fair and equitable redistribution of remuneration had not been factored into the costs to be charged to the financial cap since 2004.

In the verification of data related to one or more routes, the Canada Post Corporation has failed to implement appropriate and effective measures to ensure that employees receive the correct annual pay for their route. The employer is altering working conditions, i.e. Articles 11 and 35, Appendix “A” and other provisions of the collective agreement. Employees have been unjustly deprived of the payment they are entitled to under Article 33. This constitutes a violation of the collective agreement.

The Canada Post Corporation informed the Union of its intention to unilaterally introduce right-hand drive vehicles (RHD) on RSMC routes. The Corporation also informed the Union of its intention to charge to the RSMC financial cap the costs associated with its decision.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer has violated Articles 11, 33, Appendix "A" and other applicable articles and appendices of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers Collective Agreement in that it is treating the Sears Catalogue delivered in January 2004 as addressed admail.

Canada Post has altered the duties of the Rural and Suburban Mail Carriers (RSMC) by ordering the delivery of personal contacts items (PCI) and (CMB) lock and key replacement delivery notice cards (DNC) to points of call located at more than 0.5 km off the line of travel.

In the verification of data related to one or more routes, the Canada Post Corporation has failed to implement appropriate and effective measures to ensure that employees receive the correct annual pay for their route. The employer is altering working conditions, i.e. Articles 11 and 35, Appendix “A” and other provisions of the collective agreement. Employees have been unjustly deprived of the payment they are entitled to under Article 33. This constitutes a violation of the collective agreement.

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers grieves that the employer is in violation of Appendix "E" and other portions of the RSMC collective agreement in that its representatives on the Transition Committee have failed to meet their obligations under Appendix "E".