The long-awaited Manulife decision (N00-03-00016) has finally arrived. There are some good points to
the decision. But the arbitrator did not agree to grant all of the corrective action that the Union
sought.
Arbitrator Lauzon did not believe that the employer is sending out the Acquisition of Medical Information
(AMI) form on a systematic basis despite including some of the evidence in his decision. As a
result, he did not order the employer to stop using the Acquisition of Medical Information (AMI) form.
Positive Points
However, the arbitrator did say that the employer should only ask for a diagnosis and use the AMI
form when situations warrant it. Each request must be looked at on a case by case basis. He does agree
that the employer cannot as a matter of course send out an AMI form. This ruling is consistent with
previous case law.
The arbitrator also supports the union’s position that the union shall be involved in all accommodation
cases.
The arbitrator partially sustains the grievance and orders Canada Post to take the necessary steps to
ensure that employees are informed of their entitlement to a union representative during all steps of
the Manulife process.
CUPW has contacted Canada Post at the national level and requested a meeting to ensure that they comply
with the arbitrator’s award.
What Should You Do if Contacted by Manulife?
Any member who is contacted by Manulife either by phone or in writing should insist on union
representation. You do not have to speak to Manulife without this representation.
Discuss your case with your CUPW representative. Generally speaking, the employer has the right to
know what your medical restrictions are. This information allows the employer to assess whether or not
they have modified duties that fit your restrictions. But each case is unique, and it is important to
determine whether or not the employer has the right to ask for additional information and to ask you to fill
out the entire AMI form in your particular situation.
Each Case is Unique
Union representatives need to review the case law to ensure that in each case Canada Post is not
overstepping boundaries. One of the best cases to read is arbitrator Jolliffe’s decision in Moore
(846-88-01437) as it reviews a number of other arbitration decisions. If in doubt, stewards
should call their Local office, and local officers should call their Regional offices for advice.
In solidarity,
Cathy Kennedy
National Union representative - Grievances